HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US March 18, 2010
Merger Acquisition
             
 
Selecting a merger acquisition attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

Merger Acquisition Newsroom

 
 

< Back to Previous Page

SEC Filed an Insider Trading Action

SEC Charges Audit Committee Chairman with Insider Trading in Advance of Announcement of Merger Between Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. and Cimarex Energy Company

On February 6, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed an insider trading action in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Donald A. Erickson, former audit committee chairman and a former director of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. (MHR). The Commission alleges that Erickson engaged in unlawful insider trading in the securities of MHR ahead of the January 26, 2005 announcement of merger between MHR and Cimarex Energy Company (Cimarex).

In its complaint, the Commission alleges that in late December 2004, Donald A. Erickson, while serving as audit committee chairman and a director of MHR, purchased MHR call options during the time MHR was exploring a possible merger or sale of the company. The complaint alleges that Erickson was briefed regularly on the status of negotiations and participated in key decisions regarding the Cimarex deal. The complaint also alleges that in mid-January 2005—just two trading days before the public announcement of the merger, and one day after he attended a board meeting addressing the status of negotiations with Cimarex—Erickson exercised his call options and acquired 30,000 shares of MHR stock. According to the Commission, Erickson purchased and exercised the options based on material, nonpublic information about MHR’s merger negotiations and, ultimately, the Cimarex deal.

Further, the Commission alleges that Erickson failed to report to the Commission his purchases of MHR call options, a requirement for corporate insiders. In addition, the Commission alleges that Erickson was late in disclosing to the Commission the exercise of his options, and further alleges that his ultimate disclosure was materially false—indicating, incorrectly, that he had exercised the options after the merger announcement.

The Commission alleges in its complaint that Erickson violated Sections 10(b) and 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5, 16a-3(a), and 16a-3(g)(1) thereunder. The Commission seeks against Erickson a permanent injunction, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, civil money penalties, and an officer and director bar.


Contact a Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  Did You Know?
 

The Federal Trade Commission investigates mergers.

The FTC spends substantial time reviewing mergers and acquisitions to determine if the merger will lessen competition or create a monopoly.

Contact Merger Acquisition Attorney

The HSR Act saves on antitrust litigation.

Before the HSR Act, the agency often heard about and investigated the transaction after it had finalized. If the review found the transactions in violation of the antitrust laws, then the cases became costly and impractical.

Contact Merger Acquisition Attorney

During a merger, the operation department is responsible for a smooth transition.

The operations department within a company is among the most affected area of a business, during a merger.  Operations, ensures that the company’s network is up and running at all times during the initial merger making the move as smooth as possible.

Contact Merger Acquisition Attorney


 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Merger Acquisition Attorney.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.